A Nevada voter shouldn’t need to be an elections lawyer, a computer expert, or a party insider to understand how a ballot is handled. Confidence doesn’t come from asking people to take the system on faith. It comes from showing the work.

I try to hold myself to that standard. In my federal case over Nevada’s voter rolls, I publish my filings and every development on this site so you can read them yourself (the latest is here). When the Secretary of State’s office closed my complaint about 9,607 Nevadans with duplicate active registrations, it didn’t dispute the data, and voters still haven’t gotten a public accounting of those records. That’s the habit I want to change.

I’ve laid out the foundations (paper records, audits, one standard for every county, and quarterly public reports) in Public Trust Starts With Elections Done Right. Transparency is what makes those foundations believable. Here’s what it should look like in practice.

Publish the rules before anyone votes

Election-night totals are the last page of a long process. Voters deserve to see the first pages too. For every election, the Secretary of State’s office should publish one plain-language page that is the same for every county: registration deadlines, identification requirements, voting locations, ballot-return options, signature-cure deadlines, the audit schedule, and the certification date.

If a county does something differently, it should say so and explain why. When information is buried, late, or inconsistent, voters are left guessing. Good administration replaces guessing with answers. (Start by checking your own registration.)

Open records, private voters

Citizens have a right to inspect how public elections are run. They shouldn’t have to give up their home address, birth date, or other personal information to prove the system is accountable. Records about procedures, testing, audits, and results should be open. Sensitive personal data should stay protected, and Nevada’s voter data should stay in Nevada’s hands.

Observation with clear rules

Nevadans should be able to watch key parts of the process without disrupting the people doing the work. Observers should know ahead of time where they may stand, what they may document, whom they may ask, and how to raise a concern through the proper channel. Election workers should get the same written guidance, so the rules apply the same way whatever party an observer belongs to.

Observation isn’t confrontation. It’s accountability through visibility, and a well-organized process protects election workers as much as it reassures voters. (More on what observers should and shouldn’t do in What Election Observer Rights Mean for Nevada Voters.)

Report what’s working, and what isn’t

The quarterly public reports I’ve committed to should include numbers with context, not just raw data. For voter-roll maintenance: address updates, inactive-status changes, voters contacted, and duplicate or outdated records found and resolved. For Voter ID: how many voters asked for help getting identification, where problems clustered, and what was fixed before the next election.

When voters can see the rolls being maintained carefully, they’re less likely to be surprised at the polls, and more likely to trust that the work is being done.

Facts fast when something goes wrong

Transparency doesn’t mean publishing security details that would make systems easier to attack. But after an incident or a significant technical problem, voters deserve prompt, factual communication: what happened, what information or services were affected, and what’s being done about it. Silence leaves room for rumor. Clear facts, shared quickly and responsibly, let the public judge the situation on evidence. (More in my election cybersecurity plan.)

Results, Not Noise

An audit isn’t an accusation. An observer isn’t an adversary. A public report isn’t an admission of failure. They’re how a government that answers to its citizens shows its work. Nevada needs finality after lawful review, and that finality is stronger when every voter can see the checks actually happened.

Showing the work applies to me, too. Here’s the standard I’ll hold my own office to, in writing, before a single vote is cast.

I’ve put my plans in writing and taken the fight for clean voter rolls to federal court. Is your candidate for Nevada Secretary of State fighting this hard to protect your vote? If not, it’s time to take a closer look.

Get to know me · Join the campaign · Donate · See all policy positions

I’m not asking you to trust a party on any of this. I’m asking you to hold the office accountable for solving real problems. That’s the job, and I intend to do it.

— Brad Lee Barnhill
Independent American Party of Nevada Candidate for Nevada Secretary of State
#YourIndependentVoice — Results, Not Noise